На сайте используются cookie файлы
The site uses cookie files
Данный сайт имеет возрастное ограничение!
This site has age restrictions!
Я подтверждаю, что мне, увы, уже давно исполнилось 18 лет
On May 20, the London Wine Fair’s Judgment of London took place, and already on May 21, the organizers published the verdict — so we can discuss the results. The Drinks+ media group would like to thank the London Wine Fair organizers and events director Hannah Tovey personally for the honor of being the information partner of this exceptional event.
In recent years, the world has seen a surge in wine competitions, each striving to distinguish itself amid a crowded field. However, among the myriad events, one stands out for its historical significance and the promise of setting new standards: the Judgement of London, an homage to Steven Spurrier’s landmark Judgement of Paris.
The original Judgement of Paris in 1976 shocked the wine world when Californian wines bested their French counterparts in a blind tasting, fundamentally altering perceptions and market dynamics. This year, the London Wine Fair revisits this iconic event, updating its format to reflect the current diversity and maturity of the global wine industry.
Ronan Sayburn, MS, CEO of The Court of Master Sommeliers, and Sarah Abbott, MW, MD of Swirl Wine Group, judge of the Wine Travel Awards 2022–2023, curated this year’s Judgment of London. The panel comprises 21 esteemed judges from the UK wine industry, including leading buyers, top sommeliers, and noted wine writers. The format involves tasting pairs of European icon wines and their non-European equivalents, divided into eight pairs of whites and eight pairs of reds; all tasted under strict exam conditions.
Kateryna Yushchenko spoke with some of the leading professionals involved in the event to understand its impact on the wine world.
Kateryna Yushchenko was able to talk behind the scenes of this extraordinary event with some of the leading specialists involved in the event, before and after the tasting — to understand its algorithms and impact on the wine world.
Kateryna Yushchenko: This competition seems poised to change the standards of wine judging. Would you say it’s the best of all existing competitions?
Jancis Robinson: I have to wait and see what the wines are before making any judgment. I haven’t a clue what the wines are and how they’ve been chosen, but I always love the chance to taste wines blind. Particularly good wines blind, so I approve of the practice of comparing different regions. I think that benefits the consumer. So I think it’s a worthwhile exercise, but at the moment, I’m in the dark.
Kateryna Yushchenko: But do you think this could set new standards, especially when comparing New World and Old World wines?
Jancis Robinson: I’m not very keen on the term New World. It’s a little outdated. You can say Europe versus non-Europe. But it’s all one big world of wine where everyone tries to make the best wine. I don’t think there’s any animosity between the New and the Old. It will be interesting to see.
Kateryna Yushchenko: Would this help consumers understand the global world of wine better?
Jancis Robinson: I would be very surprised if we concluded that all New World wines are like this and all Old World wines are like that. I’m voting for how the wine is.
Kateryna Yushchenko: What are the challenges in ensuring impartiality and consistency among the judges during the blind tasting?
Sarah Abbott MW: The most important factor is the experience and selection of the judges. We needed proven experience in judging and assessing wines at a high level, a balance between specialists and generalists, and judges who approach wines with purity of heart. London is fortunate to have a deep heritage of wine education and tasting, allowing us to pull from a vast pool of experts. All wines were opened and tasted blind in a secure room, decanted into identical containers, and scored without any conferring among judges.
Over a period of four hours, 32 wines were tasted by 21 judges, a selection of the UK’s best palates, two-thirds of which were either Masters of Wine or Master Sommeliers. Each wine was scored out of 10, resulting in a grand total for each wine and an overall score for European versus Rest of World wines.
The key findings are as follows:
Overall Scores:
Riesling
Chardonnay
Chardonnay
Blend
Sauvignon Blanc
Textured
Rhône
Textured
Pinot Noir
Pinot Noir
Cabernet
Cabernet
Syrah
Textured
Grenache
Cabernet Franc
Kateryna Yushchenko: What do you expect to be the most surprising outcomes from this year’s event?
Sarah Abbott MW: Including a Saperavi from Georgia paired with a Syrah, which did really well, was quite surprising. The overall quality of the wines was superb, with incredible consistency and excitement. There wasn’t a huge difference between European and rest-of-the-world wines, which speaks to the global advancement in winemaking.
Kateryna Yushchenko: How will this influence the general world of wine?
Sarah Abbott MW: I hope it reminds everyone of the richness and depth of wine. It shows that world-class wine can come from unexpected places, uniting us in our love for great wine and making the world of wine bigger and stronger.
Kateryna Yushchenko: How does the Judgement of London serve as a tribute to Steven Spurrier’s legacy?
Ronan Sayburn MS: Steven was a great advocate for emerging wine regions. He championed distinctive styles from new regions. If he were with us, he’d be 100% behind this idea. All we can do is pay tribute to him, but it’s definitely done in his spirit.
Kateryna Yushchenko: How will the Judgement of London influence perceptions of non-European wines?
Ronan Sayburn MS: It may stop the perception that old-world wines are better. Both new-world and old-world wines are fantastic in their own right. It democratises quality wine, showing that no particular area dominates anymore. This is something Steven Spurrier would have wholeheartedly supported.
Kateryna Yushchenko: How has the evolution of the wine industry impacted the criteria for judging in this event?
Richard Bampfield MW: We’re now used to wines from many different countries. Thirty years ago, many of these wines weren’t even exported. Today, there’s more variety and diversity than ever, and I hope that will come across in what we’re tasting.
As the Judgement of London unfolds, it aims to provide a nuanced perspective on the global wine landscape, honouring Steven Spurrier’s legacy while pushing the boundaries of contemporary wine appreciation. By comparing the best of Europe with the rest of the world, it seeks not to declare a winner but to celebrate the richness and diversity of wine, ensuring that quality is recognised and appreciated universally.
As we step into this new chapter, we honor the past while embracing the global diversity that defines today’s wine landscape. The footsteps of Titan — Steven Spurrier — lead us onward, reminding us that every sip carries the weight of history and the promise of discovery. The Judgement of London not only celebrates the legacy of a visionary but also sets the stage for a future where the best wines from around the world can shine equally. In following these footsteps, we embark on a journey that enriches our understanding and appreciation of wine, underscoring its timeless allure and infinite potential.
The judges have all been selected from the UK wine industry and are considered leaders in their fields; more than 70% are either Masters of Wine or Master Sommeliers. They are:
06.09.2024
28.08.2024
30.07.2024
